Catherine M.A. Carroll
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2013–2021
4arguments since OT 2010
1–3record (side argued for), 25%
37Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
61%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2021 | Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fazaga | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 9 | 50% |
| OT 2016 | Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v. Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 41 | 57% |
| OT 2015 | Green v. Brennan | Amicus (for respondent) | Attorney | Lost | 25 | 69% |
| OT 2013 | Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co. | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 62 | 69% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).