Catherine E. Stetson
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2016–2024
3arguments since OT 2010
1–1record (side argued for), 50%
35Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
62%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2024 | Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 53 | 66% |
| OT 2023 | Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency | – | Attorney | – | 21 | 67% |
| OT 2016 | Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v. Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 31 | 55% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).