Caroline A. Flynn
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General, Attorney · argued OT 2022–2026
6arguments since OT 2010
1–3record (side argued for), 25%
62Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
53%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2026 | Department of the Air Force v. Prutehi Guahan | Respondent | Attorney | – | 44 | – |
| OT 2024 | Soto v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 52 | 51% |
| OT 2024 | Thompson v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 80 | 63% |
| OT 2023 | Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 72 | 43% |
| OT 2023 | Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the Naacp | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 41 | 43% |
| OT 2022 | Samia v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 62 | 66% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).