Cameron T. Norris

Private practice · Arlington, Virginia · Attorney · argued OT 2020–2022

2arguments since OT 2010
2–0record (side argued for), 100%
43Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
62%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
1202122

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2022Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegePetitionerAttorneyWon5473%
OT 2020Cic Services, LLC v. Internal Revenue ServicePetitionerAttorneyWon3151%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).