Benjamin W. Snyder

Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General · argued OT 2019–2023

9arguments since OT 2010
4–4record (side argued for), 50%
47Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
60%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
21920212223

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2023Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. KirtzPetitionerAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost8459%
OT 2023Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost6156%
OT 2022Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana v. TalevskiAmicusAssistant to the Solicitor General–2650%
OT 2022Wilkins v. United StatesRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost5165%
OT 2021Kemp v. United StatesRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon1167%
OT 2021City of Austin, Texas v. Reagan National Advertising of Texas IncAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon3568%
OT 2020Greer v. United StatesRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon3039%
OT 2020Republic of Hungary v. SimonAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon2765%
OT 2019Banister v. DavisAmicus (for respondent)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost1473%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).