Benjamin J. Horwich

Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General · argued OT 2010–2013

9arguments since OT 2010
6–3record (side argued for), 67%
48Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
57%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
310111213

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2013Burrage v. United StatesRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost5885%
OT 2013United States v. ApelPetitionerAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon3736%
OT 2012Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Melissa CloerPetitionerAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost4165%
OT 2012Matthew Robert Descamps v. United StatesRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost4974%
OT 2012Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. et al.PetitionerAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon5669%
OT 2011Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. et al. v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al.Amicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon28–
OT 2011National Meat Association v. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General of California et al.Amicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon16–
OT 2010Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. et al. v. Edgar D. Brown, Et Ux., Co-administrators of the Estate of Julian David Brown et al.Amicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon725%
OT 2010Russel Bruesewitz et al. v. Wyeth LLC, Fka Wyeth, Inc., Fka Wyeth Laboratories et al.Amicus (for respondent)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon2146%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).