Barbara D. Underwood
State government · New York, New York · State Solicitor General · argued OT 2010–2021
4arguments since OT 2010
1–3record (side argued for), 25%
50Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
55%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2021 | New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Lost | 53 | 51% |
| OT 2020 | Trump v. New York | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Lost | 35 | 53% |
| OT 2018 | Department of Commerce v. New York | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Won | 48 | 42% |
| OT 2010 | American Electric Power Company, Inc. et al. v. Connecticut et al. | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Lost | 65 | 76% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).