Austin Raynor
Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General · argued OT 2020–2023
8arguments since OT 2010
4–3record (side argued for), 57%
44Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
59%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2023 | Starbucks Corp. v. Mckinney | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 60 | 64% |
| OT 2023 | Brown v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 64 | 65% |
| OT 2022 | Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 11 | 46% |
| OT 2022 | New York v. New Jersey | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 18 | 35% |
| OT 2021 | Patel v. Garland | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 44 | 71% |
| OT 2021 | Johnson v. Arteaga-martinez | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 41 | 71% |
| OT 2020 | Salinas v. U.S. Railroad Retirement Board | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 32 | 65% |
| OT 2020 | Carr v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 24 | 54% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).