Ashley C. Keller
Private practice · Chicago, Illinois · Attorney · argued OT 2022–2025
3arguments since OT 2010
2–1record (side argued for), 67%
39Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
56%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Monsanto Company v. Durnell | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 27 | 55% |
| OT 2024 | Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 24 | 58% |
| OT 2022 | Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 65 | 56% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).