Ann O'Connell
Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General · argued OT 2010–2018
15arguments since OT 2010
7–4record (side argued for), 64%
42Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
72%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2018 | Washington State Department of Licensing v. Cougar Den Inc. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 24 | 88% |
| OT 2017 | Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Lundgren | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 20 | 90% |
| OT 2017 | Patchak v. Zinke | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 42 | 63% |
| OT 2017 | No. 141-orig | – | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 25 | – |
| OT 2016 | Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corp. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 16 | 53% |
| OT 2015 | Lockhart v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 41 | 64% |
| OT 2015 | Hughes v. PPL Energyplus | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 12 | – |
| OT 2014 | T Mobile South, LLC v. City of Roswell, Georgia. | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 22 | 61% |
| OT 2014 | Henderson v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 59 | 67% |
| OT 2014 | Kansas v. Nebraska and Colorado | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 20 | 75% |
| OT 2012 | PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 45 | 74% |
| OT 2012 | Charles L. Ryan v. Ernest Valencia Gonzales | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 23 | – |
| OT 2011 | Rafael Arriaza Gonzales v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 20 | 71% |
| OT 2011 | Tammy Foret Freeman et al. v. Quicken Loans, Inc. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 21 | 82% |
| OT 2010 | Kentucky, v. Hollis Deshaun King | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 28 | – |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).