Ann M. Sherman
State government · Lansing, Michigan · State Solicitor General · argued OT 2024–2025
2arguments since OT 2010
1–1record (side argued for), 50%
68Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
56%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Enbridge Energy, LP et al. v. Nessel, Attorney General of Michigan | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Won | 30 | 33% |
| OT 2024 | Perttu v. Richards | Petitioner | State Solicitor General | Lost | 105 | 79% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).