Andrew T. Tutt
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2021–2025
5arguments since OT 2010
5–0record (side argued for), 100%
48Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
57%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Harold Berk v. Wilson Choy et al. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 53 | 46% |
| OT 2024 | Feliciano v. Department of Transportation | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 61 | 61% |
| OT 2022 | Dupree v. Younger | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 47 | 60% |
| OT 2022 | Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana v. Talevski | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 23 | 58% |
| OT 2021 | Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 58 | 61% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).