Andrew J. Pincus
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2010–2019
11arguments since OT 2010
7–4record (side argued for), 64%
45Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
67%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2019 | Monasky v. Taglieri | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 25 | 73% |
| OT 2018 | Lamps Plus Inc. v. Varela | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 54 | 71% |
| OT 2018 | Frank v. Gaos | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 26 | 59% |
| OT 2016 | Kindred Nursing Centers v. Clark | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 40 | 60% |
| OT 2016 | Impression Products v. Lexmark International | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 19 | 62% |
| OT 2015 | Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 61 | 75% |
| OT 2014 | WilliamsâYulee v. the Florida Bar | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 53 | 67% |
| OT 2011 | Charles A. Rehberg v. James P. Paulk | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 63 | 63% |
| OT 2010 | AT&T Mobility LLC v. Vincent Concepcion | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 36 | 71% |
| OT 2010 | Los Angeles County, California v. Craig Arthur Humphries et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 67 | 65% |
| OT 2010 | Frantz Depierre v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 49 | 67% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).