Amy M. Saharia

Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2020–2025

3arguments since OT 2010
1–2record (side argued for), 33%
31Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
64%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
1202122232425

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2025Holsey Ellingburg, JR. v. United StatesPetitionerAttorneyWon1950%
OT 2022Dupree v. YoungerRespondentAttorneyLost4667%
OT 2020Sanchez v. MayorkasPetitionerAttorneyLost2976%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).