Amir H. Ali
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2015–2021
3arguments since OT 2010
3–0record (side argued for), 100%
44Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
50%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2021 | Thompson v. Clark | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 71 | 58% |
| OT 2018 | Garza v. Idaho | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 47 | 37% |
| OT 2015 | Welch v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 15 | 56% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).