Allyson N. Ho
Private practice · Dallas, Texas · Attorney · argued OT 2014–2025
7arguments since OT 2010
4–3record (side argued for), 57%
47Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
64%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Olivier v. City of Brandon, Mississippi et al. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 63 | 65% |
| OT 2024 | Wisconsin Bell v. U.S., ex rel. Todd Heath | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 69 | 65% |
| OT 2023 | Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Company | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 35 | 50% |
| OT 2017 | Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. GreeneâS Energy Group, LLC | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 52 | 73% |
| OT 2016 | Mclane Company v. Eeoc | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 26 | 59% |
| OT 2014 | Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass'n | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 33 | 74% |
| OT 2014 | M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 50 | 60% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).