Allon Kedem
Private practice · Washington D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General, Attorney · argued OT 2014–2024
14arguments since OT 2010
9–4record (side argued for), 69%
57Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
61%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2024 | Delligatti v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 69 | 44% |
| OT 2023 | Lindke v. Freed | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 57 | 60% |
| OT 2021 | Wooden v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 56 | 56% |
| OT 2018 | Rehaif v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 93 | 78% |
| OT 2018 | Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 7 | 75% |
| OT 2018 | Garza v. Idaho | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 25 | 73% |
| OT 2017 | United States v. Sanchez-gomez | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 77 | 53% |
| OT 2017 | Washington v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 33 | – |
| OT 2017 | Cyan v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 28 | 52% |
| OT 2016 | Esquivel-quintana v. Sessions | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 59 | 68% |
| OT 2016 | Manrique v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 35 | 47% |
| OT 2015 | Ocasio v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 61 | 63% |
| OT 2015 | Nebraska v. Parker | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 26 | – |
| OT 2014 | Coleman v. Tollefson | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 14 | – |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).