Aimee W. Brown
Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General · argued OT 2022–2026
8arguments since OT 2010
4–3record (side argued for), 57%
37Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
33%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2026 | Anderson v. Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 6 | – |
| OT 2025 | Havana Docks Corporation v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. et al. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 32 | 26% |
| OT 2025 | Dwayne Barrett v. United States | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 32 | – |
| OT 2024 | Parrish v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 33 | 33% |
| OT 2024 | E.M.D. Sales v. Carrera | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 14 | 13% |
| OT 2023 | Harrow v. Department of Defense | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 41 | 65% |
| OT 2023 | Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 38 | 42% |
| OT 2022 | Financial Oversight and Management Bd for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 20 | 17% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).