Ahilan T. Arulanantham
Private practice · Los Angeles, California · Attorney · argued OT 2016–2025
4arguments since OT 2010
0–3record (side argued for), 0%
57Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
50%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Mullin et al. v. Doe et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 47 | 43% |
| OT 2021 | Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fazaga | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 70 | 61% |
| OT 2017 | Jennings v. Rodriguez | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 44 | 47% |
| OT 2016 | No. 15-1204 | Respondent | Attorney | – | 67 | – |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).