Adam K. Mortara

Private practice · Chicago, Illinois · Attorney · argued OT 2016–2020

2arguments since OT 2010
2–0record (side argued for), 100%
–Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
63%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
11617181920

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2020Terry v. United StatesAmicus (for respondent)AttorneyWon3159%
OT 2016Beckles v. United StatesAmicus (for respondent)AttorneyWon567%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).