Aaron M. Panner
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2010–2018
5arguments since OT 2010
3–2record (side argued for), 60%
36Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
56%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2018 | Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-street.com | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 41 | 67% |
| OT 2013 | Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 29 | 45% |
| OT 2011 | First American Financial Corporation, Successor in Interest to the First American Corporation et al. v. Denise P. Edwards | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 47 | 74% |
| OT 2011 | David J. Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, Patent and Trademark Office v. Gilbert P. Hyatt | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 33 | 38% |
| OT 2010 | Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Omega, S.A. | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 29 | – |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).